by adrian » Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:54 pm
[quote="Mike I"]"Miss Coultas had earlier been found guilty at Southampton Crown Court of causing death by dangerous driving."
So by pleading not guilty to that, does she mean to say that she thinks it's safe to speed and text? Weird
I agree that the sentence feels harsh, and that on the face of it, she could count herself pretty unlucky - first to hit the cyclist, and then to get sent down for four years.
But, as it was reported elsewhere...
[quote]The hotel manageress had already been fined three times for speeding, twice on the same road leading to the junction in Southampton where the accident happened.
Had it been the first time, I doubt she would have got a prison sentence at all.
The fact that the cyclist increased the chances of this happening to him greatly by jumping the light, doesn't alter the effect on his family. Even so, I'm surprised they went through the whole 'impact statement' thing - the idea of which is to inform the sentence meted out to the defendant - as if the boy had been killed in a random, unprovoked attack.