ACC TIME TRIAL LEAGUES - Club TTs

[Jon C C on a Bianchi]

Start No. Name Time Age Vets Std Difference Position Points
15 Terry Hill 26.24 61 yrs 30.02 -3.38 1 40
22 Paul Hone 24.11 44 yrs 26.18 -2.07 2 39
19 Jon Hemming 24.26 40 yrs 25.30 -1.04 3 38
5 Jeff Hewett 27.54 54 yrs 28.25 -0.31 4 37
7 Andy Watmore 25.13 40 yrs 25.30 -0.17 5 36
14 Ian Pringle 26.36 46 yrs 26.42 -0.06 6 35
11 Jon Camden 29.48 51 yrs 27.46 2.02 7 34
6 Martin Osman 31.20 42 yrs 25.54 5.26 8 33
10 Marcus Levy 32.20 44 yrs 26.18 6.02 9 32

Well done to all the VETERANS racing on Tuesday. Please check this over - it's quite possible the maths are wrong!!!

Well done Terry Hill - a fantastic ride puts him top of the table!!

PS How the hell do you paste a table on this forum that looks like the neat table you originally produced???? aarrgghh!!!

[Jon C C on a Bianchi]

Start No. Name Time Position Points
24 Sylvain Garde 23.47 1 40
18 Andrew Green 24.02 2 39
22 Paul Hone 24.11 3 38
17 Matt Chapman 24.23 4 37
19 Jon Hemming 24.26 5 36
7 Andy Watmore 25.13 6 35
15 Terry Hill 26.24 7 34
14 Ian Pringle 26.36 8 33
16 Paul Finch 26.38 9 32
8 Andy Ellis 26.46 10 31
4 Ryan Evans 26.48 11 30
2 Phil Hawkes 27.16 12 29
9 Darren Peachey 27.25 13 28
5 Jeff Hewett 27.54 14 27
12 Sam Camden 28.11 15 26
1 Beckie Woodland 28.51 16 25
11 Jon Camden 29.48 17 24
6 Martin Osman 31.20 18 23
10 Marcus Levy 32.20 19 22

Incredibly tight set of results with seconds separating most of the riders. Everything to race for in round two coming up in a fortnight's time! Be there or be square!

[Jon C C on a Bianchi]

Position Name Time HC HC Time POINTS
1 Andy Watmore 25.13 8.00 17.13 40
2 Andy Ellis 26.46 8.00 18.46 39
3 Ryan Evans 26.48 8.00 18.48 38
4 Beckie Woodland 28.51 10.00 18.51 37
5 Phil Hawkes 27.16 8.00 19.16 36
6 Darren Peachey 27.25 8.00 19.25 35
7 Jeff Hewett 27.54 8.00 19.54 34
8 Ian Pringle 26.36 6.20 20.16 33
9 Sam Camden 28.11 7.30 20.41 32
10 Matt Chapman 24.23 3.30 20.53 31
11 Sylvain Garde 23.47 2.40 21.07 30
12 Andrew Green 24.02 2.50 21.12 29
13 Paul Hone 24.11 2.40 21.31 28
14 Terry Hill 26.24 4.30 21.54 27
15 Jon Camden 29.48 7.20 22.28 26
16 Martin Osman 31.20 8.00 23.20 25
17 Jon Hemming 24.26 0.40 23.46 24
18 Marcus Levy 32.20 8.00 24.20 23
19 Paul Finch 26.38 ? 22

THESE ARE PROVISIONAL AS I DON'T HAVE PAUL FINCH'S HC. Everything could change. That said, again extremely close results with seconds splitting most of the field. Don't forget with the Handicap 1st, 2nd and 3rd places get medals

[Jon C C on a Bianchi]

Beckie Woodland was the only female entrant this round so takes first place and 40 pts in the Women's competition with a time of 28.51.

Sam Camden (yes, and before you all groan - the idea of a Junior League had absolutley nothing to do with me - honest!! )
was the only Junior to enter so takes first place and 40 pts with a time of 28.11.

Clearly we need more women and juniors. So come on all you female Agreeables and Junior Agreeables - join in the fun and give them some competition!!!

[Jon H]

Good work JC.
Just one thing on the vets' results - the convention is that if you beat your standard its shown as plus, not a minus. Don't ask me why it's like that, I always think the logical way is the way you've done it.

[Ivor]

[quote="Jon Hemming"]Good work JC.
Just one thing on the vets' results - the convention is that if you beat your standard its shown as plus, not a minus. Don't ask me why it's like that, I always think the logical way is the way you've done it.

[Jon C C on a Bianchi]

This is turning into a full time job!!! aaarrggh!!!

Phil Hawkes tells me he's 40 - I don't believe him but there it is - so he should be in the Veterans Leagues at -1.46 and 7th place with 34 pts.

Paul Finch's PB is 25.56 so HC is 5.50 so HC Time is 20.48 = 10th place on HC.

Please amend the tables mentally I'm not doing them again this week!!!!

Cheers

Jon

[Jon C C on a Bianchi]

[quote="Jon Hemming"]Good work JC.
Just one thing on the vets' results - the convention is that if you beat your standard its shown as plus, not a minus. Don't ask me why it's like that, I always think the logical way is the way you've done it.

[Andrew G]

Thanks for the work on this Jon.

I thought the vets plus thing was a funny way to show it but then realised it was that if you beat your vets standard then it was the time you did plus x to get to the vets standard that's set.

Great stuff by Terry, an inspiration to us younger lads and lasses in the same way as John Lovell was.

[Jon H]

Us younger vets don't stand a chance against Tel. He needs some competition from someone around his age. Can we turn Alan M into a tester?