Now then, what with this recent talk of a warrant for Floyds arrest in connection with compute hacking, I have been thinking...
Of all the high profile doping cases, there is something about the Landis case that just doesn't sit right with me.
I am leaning towards genuinely believing that he was set up. Now I haven't read the countless pages of evidence for and against, but I just think that there is something not right about it all. If just one doping case from the last 20 years were to turn out to be a set up, it would have to be this one, right?
I mean surely? Getting done for a drug that needs to be taken over a long period to affect performance, so why'd he take it the night before a one off epic performance? It just doesn't stack up for me.
Thoughts?