crank-crank-crank it up...

A Place to idle the day away talking about anything you fancy. Expect to find cycling and non cycling topics inside

crank-crank-crank it up...

Postby Stu Merckx Man » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:39 pm

found a nice cheap campagnolo record chainset+crank on ebay.... but can someone just explain to me what all the compact stuff means, and how this relates to the crank length etc etc, and what difference it will make. any info greatful, as i dont want to buy something then realize i should have gone for a different size etc etc... oh and no mentioning of shimano please :lol: ...only if it will help answering th above inquiry!

deatails of this particular one are--->

Campagnolo 2006 Record Double 10 Spd Chainset

172.5mm 39/53

- Lightweight alloy fixing bolts and nuts
- Ultra Drive EPS chainrings
- Weight only 653g
- Bottom bracket length required 102mm

greatful
stu
Stu Merckx Man
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: coulsdon

Postby Jon H » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:45 pm

If it's got 39/53 rings then it's a standard chainset with a 135mm bolt circle.

A compact would have a 110mm bolt circle with something like 34/50 rings.
User avatar
Jon H
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 1:30 pm
Location: Bromley

Postby Stu Merckx Man » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:46 pm

cheers sean,

and cheers jon,

so is the crank length ok then? or isit a bit small, or a bit big or middle (im really clue less)? :oops:
stu
Stu Merckx Man
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: coulsdon

Postby richv » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:50 pm

Stu compacts are designed to take smaller chainrings then a normal double. So instead of the (now) reasonably standard 53/39 you would find 50/34 chainrings on them.


The idea is to give you access to lower gears (on the smaller chainring) without having to stick an extra chainring on as you do with a triple.

The 53/39 is a standard chainset. The cranks are 172.5mm long. I don't know what you're using at the moment but I would have guessed 170 or 172.5 would be about right for you.
richv
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 7:25 pm

Postby Stu Merckx Man » Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:51 pm

thanks rich

i just checked my crank and its 172.5, its served me well this far so it should be fine!

i think i will go for it. and its only £70...and all my palace prize money put together will cover it by next week! :D

stu
Stu Merckx Man
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: coulsdon

Postby Andrew G » Wed Jun 27, 2007 4:18 pm

Stu runs Campag (he's a bright lad) already, so switching to a Record chainset should just be a simple switching exercise to upgrade I'd have thought. Easy job to do yourself as well Stu, but you will need a crank puller tool.
Andrew G
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 10477
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Selsdon

Postby Kevin Rynne » Wed Jun 27, 2007 4:33 pm

I'd check if the bb is compatible as the lower end stuff is not compaible with record and Chorus as I recently found out. Also have a look at GBs as they had new record and chorus chainsets really cheap
Kevin Rynne
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 1:42 pm

Postby Kevin Rynne » Wed Jun 27, 2007 4:42 pm

Stu take a look at G. Butlers as they do the same chainset for £79.00. Also they do a carbon chainset for around £120 I think its fsa.
Kevin Rynne
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 1:42 pm

Postby Stu Merckx Man » Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:09 pm

im not sure what bb i have, but there not that expensive if its the wrong one though are they?

i saw the one on GBs thats 2004, the one on ebays 2006, is there any difference in them at all? or are they the same, and just released in different years?
stu
Stu Merckx Man
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: coulsdon

Postby Sylv » Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:29 pm

Stu when's your birthday - a book like this could teach you how to work on your bike yourself and avoid having to pay a shop for it :)

http://www.amazon.com/Zinn-Art-Road-Bik ... 36-0954815

You might have to buy a few tool but will still save money in the long run. Plus the satifaction of DIY work :D
User avatar
Sylv
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 5742
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: londinium, lugdunum

Postby Ian A4size » Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:33 pm

Stu- did gb's take all your stuff off the Bianchi?

You will need to know if the Merckx is english or italian threaded BB.
Ian A4size
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1525
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 8:12 pm
Location: Redhill

Postby Stu Merckx Man » Wed Jun 27, 2007 6:07 pm

[quote]Stu when's your birthday


on the 19th of july (not long now!) :P

ian- yeh GBs changed it all over. and they did have to change the BB, but i cant remember what too...i will ring them up tomorrow, but i think it might be and italian thread.
Stu Merckx Man
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: coulsdon

Postby Marek » Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:48 pm

Stu, and for information, you may want to know that in 2007 campag bought out a new version of the crankset which has no bottom bracket and saves weight etc. This is why the 2006 stuff is now a lot cheaper as most people are probably wanting to move to the new system.

Cheers

Marek...
Marek
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1969
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 4:21 pm

Postby richv » Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:15 pm

The old system still works as well as it did last year so if it's cheap take advantage.
richv
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 7:25 pm

Postby kieran » Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:31 pm

stu, what height are you, a 172.5 cranklength is longer than normal. 170 being the most common. Still I have 165 on my track bike, 170 on my road and 175 on my MTB :lol: But I prefer the 165 as it's easier to spin, the knees don't get bent so much. I would have gone for 165 on the road bike but I got it secondhand and only came in 170mm.

In the tour supplement with C+ barry hoban (multiple tour de france stage winner in 60s & 70s) didn't see the point in the use of chain rings bigger than 50T.
User avatar
kieran
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:18 am
Location: Tír na nÓg

Next

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests

cron