Comparative SRM/PT on same bike
[img]http://bp2.blogger.com/_AI4yuDhspmg/R-IS9mPEQEI/AAAAAAAAAac/wN5QwSexR0Q/s1600-h/power-table.jpg[/img]
To this you have to add the loss of power through the drivetrain for the PT, ie the PT says you are doing 309W at the hub but you can assume from this that you are actually doing 313W at the cranks, whilst the SRM says 300W only at the cranks.
Do we agree?
http://dessat.blogspot.com/2008/03/powe ... ertap.htmlThe jumping figures for the SRM seems to be well documented too.