by Bo-Gilly » Sun Nov 06, 2011 9:07 pm
[quote]Benefit Cheating sickens me more than tax evasion
Yep, benefit cheats as a general rule tend not to be very rich, so should be fairly used to not having much money. In contrast, Tax cheats are often extremely wealthy and therefore need all the money they can get their hands on to maintain the lifestyles they have become accustomed to - so at least they've got a reasonable excuse to cheat.
Here is an example of the sort of money owed by tax cheats who have been unlucky to have been caught :
Nasser Ahmed, 37, £5,102,644.00, Bristol Crown Court, 2005
Ian Andrews, 56, £16,250,000.00, Southwark Crown Court, 2007.
Alexander Bell, 45, £2,358,564.00, Kingston upon Thames Crown Court, 2008.
Jayesh Jobanputra Bhanji, 44, £1,202,815.90, Leicester Crown Court, 2009.
Robert William Briggs-Price, 55, £2,628,490.00, Nottingham Crown Court, 2006.
Steven Keith Chapman, 44, £2,487,529.33, Nottingham Crown Court, 2006.
Asad Hussain Chohan, 41, £28,602,059.61, Birmingham Crown Court, 2006.
Lawrence Martin Cook, 54, £1,421,824.38, Manchester Crown Court, 2006.
Raymond John Cox, 39, £6,831,340.00, Liverpool Crown Court, 2009.
David Lennox Dalrymple, 61, £3,667,999.42, Cambridge Crown Court, 2009.
Nicholas Andrew Davies, 62, £1,233,485.69, Southwark Crown Court, 2006.
Tariq Salim Din, 49, £1,279,835.00, Maidstone Crown Court, 2005.
John Robert Donnan, 54, £3,000,000.00, Southwark Crown Court, 2009.
Andrew Fergusson, 57, £4,431,199.00, Maidstone Crown Court, 2007.
Javid Iqbal, 40, £1,000,000.00, Preston Crown Court, 2006.
Craig Mathew Johnson, 36, £26,060,383.17, Wolverhampton Crown Court, 2008.
Daniel Jones, 53, £3,687,939.00, Worcester Crown Court, 2008.
Denis Paul Kearns, 65, £3,336,027.00, Stafford Crown Court, 2006.
Amarjit Singh Kullar, 41, £1,000,000.00, Leicester Crown Court, 2008.
Michael Marsden, 55, £3,688,980.00, Northampton Crown Court, 2008.
Leroy Samuel McIntosh, 54, £3,668,990.00, Northampton Crown Court, 2008.
Durgesh Mehta, 54, £1,008,428.50, Southwark Crown Court, 2008.
Amer Munir, 33, £5,404,460.00 (amount reduced on appeal or certificate of inadequacy), Manchester Crown Court, 2007.
Ayhan Mustafa, 42, £707,233.00 (amount reduced on appeal or certificate of inadequacy), Reading Crown Court, 2007.
Laurence Spencer Myers, 61, £4,447,927.00, Kingston upon Hull Crown Court, 2007.
Michel Namer, 51, £1,080,145.00, Guildford Crown Court, 2008.
Mohamed Nikolas, 43, £1,275,000.00, Snaresbrook Crown Court, 2005.
Thomas Joseph O'Connor, 43, £4,257,008.00, Blackfriars Crown Court, 2007.
Raymond Onaulapo, 56, £1,070,649.00, Isleworth Crown Court, 2005.
Iqbal Patel, 54, £1,666,667.00, Liverpool Crown Court, 2007.
Mubarakali Patel, 58, £1,666,667.00, Liverpool Crown Court, 2007.
Mustaq Patel, 56, £1,666,667.00, Liverpool Crown Court, 2007.
Michael Anthony Peries, 47, £1,281,552.81, Guildford Crown Court, 2006.
Anthony Perkins, 68, £1,467,225.69, Snaresbrook Crown Court, 2005.
Stephen Michael Pigott, 47, £1,498,887.60 (amount reduced on appeal or certificate of inadequacy), Canterbury Crown Court, 2007.
Simon Price, 64, £2,340,017.40, Snaresbrook Crown Court, 2007.
Mazhar Hayat Raja, 52, £1,711,672.70, Southwark Crown Court, 2009.
Amer Razman, 40, £1,877,171.05, Leeds Crown Court, 2007.
Mohammed Razak, 48, £1,060,576.21, Southwark Crown Court, 2007
Bhovinder Singh Sangha, 41, £4,729,006.14, Worcester Crown Court, 2007.
Clive Everton Saunders, 48, £1,258,066.61, Wolverhampton Crown Court, 2007.
Mark Jonothan Selby, 43, £1,378,596.65 (amount reduced on appeal or certificate of inadequacy), Southwark Crown Court, 2006.
Dean Thomas Simons, 41, £2,979,557.00, Northampton Crown Court, 2009.
Michael Tyrell, 62, £1,899,200.00, Snaresbrook Crown Court, 2005.
Brian Brendon Wright, 63, £2,311,371.00, Woolwich Crown Court, 2008.
Obviously these people who literally owed £millions to HM Revenue and Customs, needed the money to maintain their lifestyles - it's easy for the average person to forget just how important money is to wealthy people.
In the case of Craig Johnson who was ordered to repay £26 million, you can see what a struggle to would have been for him to maintain his mansion, Meaford Hall, and 22 acres grounds, he clearly needed every penny he could get :
[img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/08/article-1264509-090C3C6F000005DC-372_468x332.jpg[/img]
[url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7650883.stm]Fraudster's 'pop star' lifestyle[/url]
Of course I'm not condoning what Mr Johnson did, but you can at least see that the millions he cheated could be justified in that it had a significant effect on his life. I doubt whether your average benefit cheat really needs the pittance he swindles to maintain his lifestyle. It also helps to explain why tax cheats cost the Treasury 15 times more than benefit cheats.