by Toks » Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:46 pm
[quote] I think the idea of a road captain is excellent. PVT does the role required of him admirably at the moment, collating results and points, organising events, commisaring and attending various AGMs but yeah i think it could be time for an additional role alongside that. Maybe the AGM would consider it?
The problem with Paul Tunnel's role as road race secretary is that for some reason he can't access the Forum. As you all know the forum really is a hub of activity as far as racing is concerned. This is where most people post results, ask questions, discuss training, arrange training meets and announce future events.
This year in particular the Forums role in all things racing has been crucial . Questions regarding licences, category information, training meets, entry costs and types of courses have all been comprehensively answered by RichV, Kieran, Marek, Ajay, Huw, Marco myself and one or two others. In fact results, quite often are posted by people that don't even race (Sean, Ian Munnery et al ) which is great cause it shows that even though you're
not competitive in races doesn't mean your not keen to see ACC riders doing well; but, more importantly, it shows you appreciate what they are doing.
Paul Tunnels vast racing experience and knowledge is going a miss. For example, he wasn't even aware that there had been an ACC club road race last year and for some reason only found out about this years race with a week to go. And then, despite much campaigning/advertising from myself and Sean thought it was a BCF race and almost unknowingly derailed the whole event.
On the day Paul appeared to be a little surpised when I explained there would be two groups of riders in the race and then found out to his detriment how good the standard of both A and B racers were. Although I should add that on the day he showed up with forms, numbers and lots of good advice
Furthermore perhaps Pauls profile needs to be raised, when he commissioned one of the CP crit races this year I actually had to tell some of the ACC racers in the event that he was actually our Road Race sec. Is this symptomatic of how RR is viewed at the club generally?
At last years ACC events dinner I realised how much TT racing tends to be the clubs focus competition wise. And yes you have to agree, in last years RR's we did not have a great deal to shout about when compared to the TT boys and girls so RR talk was glossed over in general. Shamefiully I wasn't at this years ACC dinner event so don't know whether this years Road Racing success was made clear to all those present - I think we had some pretty decent results with quite a few wins. Its been a great year for the road racers in particular but the momentum musn't stop now that its started.
Everyone needs a motivational push as well as some encouragement. All round good egg and club motivator Ajay told me to get down to Hillingdon three years ago, and after loosing my bottle and opting just to watch on the first couple of occassions I was finally brave enough to pop my racing cherry at the 3rd time of asking in late summer 2003. As Kieren has hinted only the supremely competitive confident types will continue to go racing regardless. People like Jon Saddler (ex ACC), Philip Watkins (ex acc), Dave K (ex acc) and Tony Kelly (
) just continued racing with few people really knowing how well they were doing or when they were racing. Obviously there's much more communication (see Hillingdon thread) now so this has changed for the better I think. There's no denying that the more people you see racing in an event in your club colours the more likely you're gonna give it a try next time round. Why do you think there are so many Dynamo riders!.
Personally I think ACC has got the balance almost right. As both Sean and Andrew have said it is essentially a club for the social riders - but with a healthy 19mpg and a 'training group' it also has more to offer than purely social clubs like Islington etc or indeed so called racing clubs. So to keep a happy medium its important that all the rides do exactly what they say. For example, 19mph should average that speed unless collectively everyone agreees to up the tempo. There's also the need for some collective responsibility especially where newbies/mechanicals etc are concerned. In my last training group ride Stu fell behind and some people didn't appear keen on waiting but I insisted we wait especially since he's a youth rider who's quite new to the club
Finally I do feel there's a slight irrational fear of attracting purely racer types such that any suggestion of putting on more promotions (beginners race would be a great idea!) or improving organisation racing wise is probably frowned upon by the club hierachy. This year I just picked up on Rob Fallon's brilliant idea of a club RR. Rob too was highly motivated and wanted to get more people racing for ACC even though it wasn't his first claim club.