by Will » Wed May 23, 2007 11:18 am
I wonder if it would be William Fotheringham? My only reason for suggesting that is that he's the only Guardian cycling journalist I can remember! Of course, he's also an excellent journalist, well-respected, well-connected, etc.
Did you ever listen (it may have been you who posted it Marco) to that mp3 recording of an interview with Floyd immediately after the news broke last year, and before Floyd had issued his public denial?
He was asked (I think) if he had doped, and his reply was a bizarre: "I guess I should say no". A very weird interview.
Back to the article, given the doubts expressed about the testing, I suspect [url=http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/12293.0.html]this paragaph[/url] sums up the case:
[quote]Meier-Augenstein, a professor from Queen's University in Belfast, Ireland, and an expert in IRMS analysis, took a similar tack, calling into question many of the French lab's findings.
"From what I have seen I would not have great confidence in the results," the quick-tongued, owlish professor said during direct questioning from Landis lead attorney Maurice Suh. "There are a lot of assumptions being made. I'm terribly sorry, but if someone's life depends on it, and his career depends on it, you don't go on assumptions."
Not sure he looks that much like an owl though.
[img]http://images.velonews.com/images/news/12293.18679.t.jpg[/img] [img]http://fusionanomaly.net/owl.jpg[/img]