Kent Cycles 10

A place to put your results for posterity and to tell everyone what might have been!

Kent Cycles 10

Postby Jon H » Sat Apr 28, 2007 1:28 pm

Six agreeables were up early this morning to ride the Q10/19 course at Tonbridge. Seemed to be quite tough on the outbound stretch, and super fast on the way back. So fast, in fact, that the finish came rather sooner than normal. Oh, how we laughed as we went past the finish timekeeper at about 9.3 miles :evil:

So, results for the somewhat less than 10 miles:

Paul Tunnell & Tamar Collis on Tandem 20:35
Richard Viney 20:54
Jon Hemming 21:21
Robert Royle-Evatt 22:13
Andrew Green 25:05
User avatar
Jon H
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 1:30 pm
Location: Bromley

Postby Andrew G » Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:47 pm

Yeah, bit of a bugger Jon the 4:30 alarm call seemed a bit wasted. I'd only gone to try and get a quick time, but then that nasty head wind on the out leg was going to put paid to that anyway.

I always suffer more in to a head wind, than I seem to feel benefit from the tail wind. Still pleased to ride the return all on 53x11,12, & 13 though, just a shame it wasn't the full distance. There seemed quite a few pissed off riders as they'd all had their best TT kit out for this course :D . All the Addiscombe riders seemed to be a bit more philosophical.

It gave me a good workout though and I seemed to get my head in gear quite well so pushed hard all the way. Last year my mind drifted a lot so I never really saw an improvement.

Anyway after this, back home before heading off to Holmwood for an afternoon 10 as well.....continued in another thread.
Andrew G
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 10477
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Selsdon

Postby Andrew G » Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:04 pm

Not legit Sean as it's not 10 miles. We can all claim a PB for distance though :wink:
Andrew G
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 10477
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Selsdon

Postby Andrew G » Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:44 pm

Just noticed the times, blimey Richard not far behind the tandem on his tod!
Andrew G
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 10477
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Selsdon

Postby richv » Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:30 pm

Just downloaded my computer data for this one. I really don't like going down the hill and now I know why. I maxed out at 50.4 mph having stopped pedalling 10 seconds earlier :shock: I did just avoid the urge to brake this time though :lol:

Luckily I'll have another go in a couple of weeks when I'll be driving PVT down it on the tandem :wink:

I raced on after the 'finish' to get some useful data and it was about 1.25 extra to get to the proper finish so not a particularly fast morning despite the reputation of the course.
richv
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 7:25 pm

Postby Dominic » Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:37 pm

Good luck on the driving, sounds positively frightening!!
Dominic
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 6:43 pm
Location: Merstham

Postby mrP(Boonen)VT » Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:33 pm

[quote]Just noticed the times, blimey Richard not far behind the tandem on his tod!


Blimey Andrew, you'll make him even more insufferable :roll:

Anyway, we went down the hill at 55mph :!:
Guru P
User avatar
mrP(Boonen)VT
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 9:10 pm
Location: kitchen chair

Postby Andrew G » Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:49 pm

If you two can stop bickering at each other you should set a lightening quick time with the speed you're both travelling at. :D
I shall keep my fingers crossed for a calm day, I mean the weather now, and look out for the time with interest.
Andrew G
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 10477
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Selsdon

Postby richv » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:25 am

[quote="mrpvt"][quote]Just noticed the times, blimey Richard not far behind the tandem on his tod!


Anyway, we went down the hill at 55mph :!:


They do say that the fat ones go downhill quicker :wink:
richv
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 7:25 pm

Postby Tamar Collis » Mon Apr 30, 2007 11:08 am

Yeah, well, I'd noticed Mr Tunnell had stupidly gone and lost a load of weight so I have selflessly been eating cake to try to add some ballust.
Tamar Collis
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:03 am

Postby Tamar Collis » Mon Apr 30, 2007 11:09 am

Yeah, well, I'd noticed Mr Tunnell had stupidly gone and lost a load of weight so I have selflessly been eating cake to try to add some ballust.
Tamar Collis
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:03 am

Postby mrP(Boonen)VT » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:09 pm

[quote]They do say that the fat ones go downhill quicker


So we'll be set then Richard :?:

The 10 stone partner
Guru P
User avatar
mrP(Boonen)VT
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 9:10 pm
Location: kitchen chair
Top

Postby richv » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:13 pm

[quote="mrpvt"][quote]They do say that the fat ones go downhill quicker


So we'll be set then Richard :?:

The 10 stone partner


I'm not sure I fancy doing 70mph down that hill :shock:

And there's no way you're 10 stone :!:

Albeit I'm slightly above my race weight at the moment :oops:
richv
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 7:25 pm
Top

Postby mrP(Boonen)VT » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:19 pm

Actually, I conquered it this morning - 10 st 13 3/4 to be exact. A bit like 59:59 is still "under".

70mph? No having been down there, I don't think so as we ran out of revs. Reckon 60 is doable.

[quote]Albeit I'm slightly above my race weight at the moment


Hmmmmmmm...booking excuses already?
Guru P
User avatar
mrP(Boonen)VT
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 9:10 pm
Location: kitchen chair
Top


Return to Results

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

cron