New Bike Advice

A Place to idle the day away talking about anything you fancy. Expect to find cycling and non cycling topics inside

Postby SimonJOsborne » Fri May 11, 2007 6:12 pm

[quote="A J C"]Keep them then maybe upgrade to Dura Ace wheels later on, ask Sylv about them...


Hmm sounds like a plan. And when I get round to it the Race Lites would be great on the 1400.

Another thing I was thinking about was going for a different pedal system on this bike (and my 1400 if I do). I like the durability of my existing bog standard SPD's, but was contemplating Keo's. Thoughts?
SimonJOsborne
...
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: Shirley

Postby -Adam- » Fri May 11, 2007 6:45 pm

Stay with shimano, please!!!

I had look pedals but didnt like them much.

Have Ultegra pedals from '05 and have no problems with them! And im sure the new ones are even better...
User avatar
-Adam-
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:38 pm
Location: Kingston/Epsom, well, everywhere really!

Postby SimonJOsborne » Fri May 11, 2007 7:16 pm

Never tried SPD-SL's.
SimonJOsborne
...
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: Shirley

Postby Robh » Fri May 11, 2007 9:44 pm

I'll second Dauphin, was there in Early April for a bike fit for a new frame. For the first session I was there for 1.5hrs. Very thorough guys!

Rob
Robh
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 2:34 pm
Location: West Sussex, Crawley

Postby -Adam- » Fri May 11, 2007 11:11 pm

Simon, they are more or less the same design as Look, but i just prefer the Shimano offering. I think your foot is closer to the pedal axle which is a good thing, more direct power transfer...
User avatar
-Adam-
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:38 pm
Location: Kingston/Epsom, well, everywhere really!

Postby John Sheridan » Fri May 11, 2007 11:23 pm

re gears:

one more thing to consider - 53/39 + 13-29 is available with campag 10 speed and works with a short cage derailleur. 39/29 isn't far off what a triple will do for you. I've got that range on my bike and it's gotten me through 3 etapes and I'm definitely not a mountain goat.
John Sheridan
.
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 8:44 am

Postby SimonJOsborne » Mon May 14, 2007 10:48 am

And so the saga begins...

I went to Sigma Sport and got fitted for a bike on Saturday. The print out said I needed a bike with a 608mm top tube. This seemed to rule out a lot of options for me, including a 62cm Madone (incidentally there don't seem to be any left in the UK anyway). So we started talking about Roubiax's.

I went to GBs after that for a chat. And it wasn't looking good on bike sizes, especially considering the time of year when all the larger bikes are out of stock. They said, as did Leon at Sigma, it would be helpful to see my existing bike.

So I went straight back with my bike at 5pm. First thing they said my bike was set up totally wrong, as the saddle was too low, and when the shorter stem was fitted for some reason it was turned up the other way (which I rectified later at home). And my bike was slightly too large for me. After sitting on a few bikes they reckon a 595mm top tube should work. So I am going to go back next Saturday and try riding a rather tasty Look KG486 and a Roubaix test bike. I get the feeling they would like to sell the Look but at £3300 its way out of my price range, even with a good deal I am sure. Must resist :)

And after pouring over the Specialized catalouge I quite like the look and idea of the Roubiax Pro, as it suits the kind of riding I like. It's a nice specced bike too, but I am not sure whether I would prefer a full Dura Ace groupset rather than the Dura Ace/Ultegra/FSA K Force crankset and bearings cocktail. Don't know much about Roval Fusees either. And if I am totally honest the price is a little more than I was anticipating but who knows maybe I can get a decent deal.

On the gears front I like the concept of a compact (which incidentally is stock on a Ruby) but looking at the ratios I just wonder if changing from a 50 - 34 is going to be a big jump. So maybe a 53/39 and different cassette is the way to go. Hmm more thinking needed.

I did a short ride on Sunday and I found the new riding position ok. Lower back is aching a little today though :(
SimonJOsborne
...
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: Shirley

Postby Jon H » Mon May 14, 2007 4:18 pm

I don't claim to be some kind of bike fitting guru, but I can't see how these guys can state that you need a 608mm or 595mm top tube, when the top tube length is just one number making up the bike geometry as a whole package. Unless (and this may be a bit cynical) they have a bike of that size they're planning on selling to you.

I would be more impressed with the bike sizing service if they came up with dimensions for saddle height and layback from the bottom bracket, and saddle to handlebar reach and drop, and crank length. Those are the important dimensions because that covers the points where you make contact with the bike. Then within that framework a variety of bike sizes (within reason) would fit you, with differences in the top tube length, frame angles, head tube height etc being adjusted with saddle position, head tube spaces, stem length and angle etc.
User avatar
Jon H
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 1:30 pm
Location: Bromley

Postby SimonJOsborne » Mon May 14, 2007 4:53 pm

After he put my details into the computer it did come up with a bunch of dimensions around the entire frame geometry including saddle height, crank length etc.

But according to GB because I have a small torso and back (for some who is 6'4" anyway) I shouldn't need a bike that is as big as you would expect. So hopefully next Saturday I will be able to find the right size in practice when I ride some bikes. I am concerned about getting it right. How much will I find out from riding the bikes, even the test bike for an hour or so? Sometimes I find aches or pains don't manifest quickly.

I am not sure why they focused on the top tube length, but when they were talking about different frames this was the key dimension they were discussing.

And I am definitely not going to buy anything unless I am comfortable on the bike, and it's in my price range. I think my choice is going to be restricted by size.
SimonJOsborne
...
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: Shirley

Postby Marek » Mon May 14, 2007 9:27 pm

Simon,

I am 6ft 5in and I have long legs, my saddle height is 87cm from centre of crank to top of saddle. The reason why they look at the length of the top tube is to make sure that you are comfortable in terms of not having to lean too far forward, but making sure you are stretched enough.

I would recommend a visit to Dauphines, they won't mess you about and they will find something that fits you in terms of price and the like.

I have heard though that Specialized are a good bike for the taller rider.

Cheers

Marek....
Marek
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1969
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 4:21 pm

Postby SimonJOsborne » Tue May 15, 2007 9:36 pm

[quote="Marek"] The reason why they look at the length of the top tube is to make sure that you are comfortable in terms of not having to lean too far forward, but making sure you are stretched enough.


I think thats something I have to pay particular attention to. I didn't feel comfortable on my 63cm Trek with a 130mm stem so ended up changing the stem. GB said, and I have thought myself, that my bike is a little on the large side for me.

I was looking at Dauphines site earlier on, it looks like a great shop. Then I saw the Orbea Orca :) Why do I have to keep seeing all these fantastic looking bikes somewhat out of my price range? And why is it I start thinking well it's not that expensive :twisted:

BTW anyone know of any decent bike review pages?
SimonJOsborne
...
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: Shirley

Postby Robbie Dread » Wed May 16, 2007 2:42 am

Go to Dauphin's on box hill mate best cycle shop in England,they do the best bike fit and right prices too for bikes
Robbie D
Robbie Dread
..
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:24 pm
Location: Croydon

Postby Dombo » Thu May 17, 2007 8:50 am

[quote="SimonJOsborne"]

Why do I have to keep seeing all these fantastic looking bikes somewhat out of my price range? And why is it I start thinking well it's not that expensive :twisted:

BTW anyone know of any decent bike review pages?


THey look expensive when compared to other bikes. Compare them instead to a really crummy small car and they look fantastic value, will give you more pleasure and last longer. Sounds like you are beginning to think that way :wink:

Try http://www.roadbikereview.com
http://www.cyclingplus.co.uk

Also Googling the name of the bike you're considering often throws up a lot of articles, reviews, diary pieces etc. Half the fun is in choosing the bike.
User avatar
Dombo
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 3:03 pm

Postby -Adam- » Thu May 17, 2007 11:28 am

Google is the way forward simon, thats what i did when choosing new wheels.

[url]http://www.pezcyclingnews.com[/url]

Another website that has a few tests here and there, same as

[url]http://www.cyclingnews.com[/url]

Just dont get distracted by

[img]http://www.pezcyclingnews.com/photos/babes/babes07/giro07-miss7.jpg[/img]

if you do visit Pez!
User avatar
-Adam-
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:38 pm
Location: Kingston/Epsom, well, everywhere really!

Postby -Adam- » Thu May 17, 2007 11:37 am

No but they coukd show how refreshing their mineral water is and have a wet t-shirt competion!
User avatar
-Adam-
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:38 pm
Location: Kingston/Epsom, well, everywhere really!

PreviousNext

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests

cron