Integrated Headset Confusion!!!

A Place to idle the day away talking about anything you fancy. Expect to find cycling and non cycling topics inside

Integrated Headset Confusion!!!

Postby Matt Robbins » Thu May 24, 2007 11:41 am

Hi,

I know there are different standards for integrated headsets. Is it true to say the main ones are 36/45 and 45/45 (Camapg Std?)....

Also are forks compatible with a specific integrated headset standard or does this not matter?

Any info greatly appreciated!

Matt.
Matt Robbins
...
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:22 pm

Postby Matt Robbins » Thu May 24, 2007 12:21 pm

To answer part of my own question it appears that actually the only difference with so called 'integrated' forks are that they attempt to be shaped to give a smooth uniterupted line to the frame...they use an ISO 1 1/8 crown race which is what really matters.

Still a bit confused re 36/45 and 45/45...I think this is to do with the angle of the headtube and therefore the effect on the bearing size required...

Just off to clean my anorack...
Matt Robbins
...
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:22 pm

Postby Elliot M » Thu May 24, 2007 12:34 pm

Believe the 36/45 and 45/45 refer to the angles of each of the diagonal "shoulder" part of the bearing cartridges.

There are corresponding grooves in the frame's headtube so yes you need to know which your frame is.

Or if you take out the old bearings, the angles should be printed on there. Or I assume you should be able to tell if they are both the same (Campag) or different top and bottom (36/45)
Elliot M
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1648
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 10:09 am
Location: On the Merlin Extralight

Postby Matt Robbins » Thu May 24, 2007 12:56 pm

Thanks Elliot, that makes it clearer.
Matt Robbins
...
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:22 pm


Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests

cron