by Andrew G » Wed Oct 24, 2007 2:46 pm
Apologies if I was misinformed about Dave Clarke, and I'm not suggesting Blue Sky shouldn't compete because I've not heard of them (I have heard of Blue bikes though). I also agree that it adds to the occaision to have big names riding.
It's never going to affect me personally, and I'll never be in a team that contests prizes.
I only think it's a bit unfair for people to (if they did, and again apologies if misinformed) ride for a team that isn't their 1st claim club/team to split a large prize pot. That said Evans sponsor the event and have a lot of top hill climbers so 9 out of 10 times they'd be giving the money to their own riders.
I know I can be old fashioned in some of my views, but it seems a shame that such a minor branch of a minority sport seems to be throwing up certain comments. (Not just me I've seen others on other forums, again I can't comment for the validity). Dave Clarke for example has ridden the Premier Calendar unattached all year, so why if he was such a part of the Blue Sky outfit did he not wear their jersey in any of these events - he even rode in plain colours on Sunday. The team prize in these CTT events is meant to go to the club with the best placed riders, if you start having composite teams and expecting ACC to compete it is hardly fair. Even Hutch, Tadros and co are valid members of In-Gear and ride in their colours all year even if they don't train together, so I have no problem with pro / semi-pro outfits competing. It's taking the piss if they then start manipulating this to beat the likes of Bec CC.
Clarke rode for HBM Mercia CC in the Halifax HC [url]http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/Clarke_beats_Dobbin_in_Halifax_Road_Club_HillClimb_article_150613.html[/url]