HR v Power

I know all this training business makes us sound a bit serious but, well, some people really are into this bike lark so feel free to talk about all training & self improvement related topics in here

Re: HR v Power

Postby Toks » Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:07 pm

[quote="Robh"]Example :-

240 watts can be one day perfect Slow Twitch Fibre training with good respiration and good RPM . In a fatigued stage of any of the systems 340 watts can be a "surviving " intensity with the need of Fast Twitch Fibre , high lactate, high HR and an overload of respiratory system.

So Yes it still was 240 watts the next day but with a completely different stress on your system .

So 240 watts just shows you your performance not the system you stressed.


Rob
Ok but so what. George can push out 400watts aerobically where else for someone in the Just For Fun group that would be an anaerobic effort (way above threshold). Once you know the breakdown of what trains what - according to the training zones/levels then whats so special about what the FACT people are doing. And more importantly how is it gonna make me ride my bike faster? :D
Toks
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 10:17 pm
Location: Highbury, North London

Re: HR v Power

Postby Robh » Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:08 pm

[quote="Grahame"]So in summary:

If you want to ride faster, ride faster*





*but take a break every now and then to let your body recover.


Exactely...Training makes you worse, recovery makes you better!
Robh
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 2:34 pm
Location: West Sussex, Crawley

Re: HR v Power

Postby Daniel Gee » Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:12 pm

mad thirsty rabid aggression works 4 me :evil:

it helps if you like to watch others suffer too :twisted:

but hey thats bike racing :wink:
Daniel Gee
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:33 pm
Location: sunny penge

Re: HR v Power

Postby Toks » Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:14 pm

[quote="Robh"]Toks think out of the box...Or you will never understand!

Do you know if your respiratory system is holding you back?

Do you know the Oxygen delivery system is holding you back?

Do you know if you have fully developed your structural system?

I can't answer yall our question but if you willing to think out of the box and let me do a Level 2 test then we can look at your wekanesses!

If you want to learn more come onto the FaCT-Canada forum and Juerg can answer your question (pm for the link) or carry on as you are it's your choice!

I was warned the people who don't want to think out of the box will be reistant to the FaCT ideas.
:)
Rob
Are you sure this dude ain't just trying to overcomplicate sshit to make money :roll:
Toks
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 10:17 pm
Location: Highbury, North London

Re: HR v Power

Postby Robh » Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:16 pm

[quote="Toks"][quote="Robh"]Example :-

240 watts can be one day perfect Slow Twitch Fibre training with good respiration and good RPM . In a fatigued stage of any of the systems 340 watts can be a "surviving " intensity with the need of Fast Twitch Fibre , high lactate, high HR and an overload of respiratory system.

So Yes it still was 240 watts the next day but with a completely different stress on your system .

So 240 watts just shows you your performance not the system you stressed.


Rob
Ok but so what. George can push out 400watts aerobically where else for someone in the Just For Fun group that would be an anaerobic effort (way above threshold). Once you know the breakdown of what trains what - according to the training zones/levels then whats so special about what the FACT people are doing. And more importantly how is it gonna make me ride my bike faster? :D


Nothing special just raining in the correct zones not based on mathematical forumlas. Even the standard threshold test using 2mmol and 4mmol is flawed and I can expalin wh yas I witnessed it in Mallorca. the guys use those zones and when we used the level II test his lactate threshold was 17bpm comapred to his lactate balance point. So at his recovery zone he was working to hard using the 2mmol/4mmol figure.

Level II test I can personalise your zones by looking at the following trends :- lactate, blood glucose, respiratoy rate, o2 saturation and perceived effort.

We are not machines so how can you use a mathematical forumlas.

I suggest you read my post on their forum I was skeptical just like you 3 months ago, join the discussion and have fun :-

http://www.fact-canada.com/discus/messa ... 1209567450
Last edited by Robh on Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:44 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Robh
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 2:34 pm
Location: West Sussex, Crawley
Top

Re: HR v Power

Postby Robh » Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:18 pm

I can see I'm not going to win this argument and I don't intend to as I said I just wanted to share ideas.

Good luck with your season Toks! Next time you have a bad day on the bike think which system was limiting you on that day? Come back to me and I will have a look into it.

Rob
Robh
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 2:34 pm
Location: West Sussex, Crawley

Re: HR v Power

Postby -Adam- » Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:20 pm

Ok Rob,

So in theory at least... After 5 consecutive days of training/racing from last wednesday to sunday (with limited sleep also). Which culiminated in my longest ever race, almost 3 hours, on Sunday. I was obviously fairly tired. With much Uni work to do I didn't have time to train/do recovery rides yesterday or monday.

Today I rode for 90 minutes, and for more or less the first 60mins, my legs felt rather heavy. But as the last 30mins of the ride drew to a close, I felt good again. Strong and fast.

Can you please offer up an explanation as to what was going on in my body through the past 72hours or so...??

Cheers...
User avatar
-Adam-
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:38 pm
Location: Kingston/Epsom, well, everywhere really!

Re: HR v Power

Postby Rob C » Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:57 pm

Why don't you make it tough for him Adam? Perhaps he could recite your life story to date followed by predictions for the next 20 years

:D
Rob C
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 562
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 9:19 pm

Re: HR v Power

Postby Robh » Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:59 pm

[quote="-Adam-"]Ok Rob,

So in theory at least... After 5 consecutive days of training/racing from last wednesday to sunday (with limited sleep also). Which culiminated in my longest ever race, almost 3 hours, on Sunday. I was obviously fairly tired. With much Uni work to do I didn't have time to train/do recovery rides yesterday or monday.

Today I rode for 90 minutes, and for more or less the first 60mins, my legs felt rather heavy. But as the last 30mins of the ride drew to a close, I felt good again. Strong and fast.

Can you please offer up an explanation as to what was going on in my body through the past 72hours or so...??

Cheers...


Good question Adam what do you think?

Not knowing your training for the 5 days and how your body reacted in those sessions I don't know. But there is an easy way according to my notes, how you at least can check recovery for the different systems.

Cardio recovery over HRV
Metabolic recovery over resting lactate
Pulmonary recovery over O2 sat and breathing frequency.
CNS motor recruitment over surface EMG.

For the last 3 months I've been using Heart Rate Variability on my polar watch to gauge my cardio recovery. Now I have have 02 sat and a brain to count breahting frequency I can check my pulmonary system.
Robh
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 2:34 pm
Location: West Sussex, Crawley
Top

Re: HR v Power

Postby Toks » Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:06 pm

[quote="Robh"]For the last 3 months I've been using Heart Rate Variability on my polar watch to gauge my cardio recovery. Now I have have 02 sat and a brain to count breahting frequency I can check my pulmonary system.
mmm nice :roll: whats ya FT at the moment?
Toks
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 10:17 pm
Location: Highbury, North London
Top

Re: HR v Power

Postby Ian A4size » Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:08 pm

Can you please offer up an explanation as to what was going on in my body through the past 72hours or so...??

About 6 pints of leffe, 4 sausage sandwiches, 2 quiche, and a large twix- if Sundays BBQ was anything to go by! :wink:
Ian A4size
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1525
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 8:12 pm
Location: Redhill

Re: HR v Power

Postby Robh » Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:28 pm

[quote="Toks"][quote="Robh"]For the last 3 months I've been using Heart Rate Variability on my polar watch to gauge my cardio recovery. Now I have have 02 sat and a brain to count breahting frequency I can check my pulmonary system.
mmm nice :roll: whats ya FT at the moment?


Don't know Toks...No longer using that measurement have not done a single interval since middle of Jan. I've basically done Bi-STF rides for the last 3 months @ LBP-30. I had my balance point checked for the first time in Mallocra and it was 165bpm. What that means all my rides have been over those 3 month 33bpm less than my balance point HR.

To monitor performance I will be checking every 3 months what my power is at LBP.

BI-STF rides is structural training which has a slow response compared to functional training the aim is to build on mitochondria , blood vessels, bone density , tendon density , liver size, neurological connections and so on .

Your thinking now i'm gonna be riding slow...Your right I will be and Juerg Feldman has found from extensive research with his 2 Canadian Olympians Ryder Hyjesdal & Geoff Kabush from 10 years of training spending 90% of your time in the Bi-STF zone brings better gains than just beating yourself up with interval training. I've got nothing to loose so will be trying it out for the next year.

I was shown at the Mallorca camp a 50 year old guy who has spent all his life riding hard and when he was told to ride 90% of his time @ LBP-20 (135bpm) he gained 40W @ his LBP in under a year. That from just riding slower and not doing any interval training. He was very strict and made sure he rode at the heart rate. Crazy a 40W increase without doing intervals. Those gains are for good..

Rob
Robh
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 2:34 pm
Location: West Sussex, Crawley
Top

Re: HR v Power

Postby -Adam- » Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:19 pm

So is that proof in the pudding that longer steady rides are in fact good for you!? I knew I spent hours on my bike over the winter for something, lets face it the combined experience of the people I listen too can't be that wrong. I'm stronger than I have ever been right now, and just feel like I can ride and ride.

Back to my original query Rob.

Last Weds, 90 mins fast tempo stuff, about 240w av, around 160bpm, 240w is approximately my lactate turnpoint.
Thurs, 200mins, some threshold work, about 50mins, rest around 210w av.
Fri, 90mins at 210w
Sat, CR 180mins @ 185w av, 155bpm av
Sun, 170mins @ 260w, 169bpm av

So like I say, a fairly tough 5 days. I think my dead leg feeling was to do with a lack of warm down on sunday after the race. And poor immediate post race recovery, i.e standing around at a BBQ as previously mentioned with a couple of beers, and greasy BBQ food. So I would imagine it was a delayed action of recovery and fuel replenishment that lead to my dead legs. But like I say, after 60mins they soon got going again, thoughts?
User avatar
-Adam-
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:38 pm
Location: Kingston/Epsom, well, everywhere really!

Re: HR v Power

Postby Robh » Thu May 01, 2008 7:33 am

Regarding long steady rides yes...According to FaCT if it is in the correct zone which is FFA. Using the FaCT test I could tell you that. Problem with the standard lactate threshold test they use absolute number unlike trends, your lactate numbers can be affected by your diet.

Example if you do the test with your glycogen stores full your lactate numbers will be higher compared to doing the same test 3 days later being glycogen depleted. The reason why because their is more lactate in the system which is a byproduct of glucose being broken down by the liver. The standard test uses absolute numbers and with 2 different results which test is correct?

The standard test says if you’re over 4mmol your anaerobic. At the Joshua Tree FaCT camp they measured people's lactate values pre and post breakfast. Pre breakfast values ranged between 1mmol to 2mmol post breakfast 4.5mmol plus. Does this mean when these people were eating they were doing an anaerobic workout according to the standard test protocol?

Adam when you had your test can you remember how much you ate and if your glycogen stores were full when you next got tested? Most people probably wouldn't know.

Most university studies have show interval training is always wins versus long steady rides because the studies only last 6-8 weeks. The improvements from steady rides in your Free Fatty Zone (FFA) takes years and the gains are smaller initially so not so impressive initially.

One of the most impressive people, where the slower worked better & showed an incredible change was Mark Allen Iron Man champion. He just trained too fast and too hard and one of the delivery systems (The FFA oxygen dependent delivery group) was not trained well and he never had the ability at the end to keep up with D. Scott. Once they included this system into the workout he was able to give the other system Glucose oxygen dependent delivery a less heavy workload and they had some efficiency left at the end of the race.

Might have to seek advice on your question Adam if you want an answer. I do know a proper cool down is important and so is nutrition after a workout to reduce this catabolic effect where your body is still working after you have finished the race.

I will email and ask and it's good for me to know as well.

Rob
Robh
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 2:34 pm
Location: West Sussex, Crawley

Re: HR v Power

Postby kieran » Thu May 01, 2008 9:33 am

em, my take on Robs post is as follows:

Say like today i did a 2X20 this morning, going by heart rate, I kept it around 173bpm. As I was feeling very fresh (no racing at Palace) maybe at for this session 173bpm= XXX Watts, so that if I had a power meter I would have been trying to keep my power around XXX W.

Tomorrow i will do another 2x20, again I will try to keep my hr around 173bpm, but this time due to todays session I probably will not be putting out XXX Watts but say YYY Watts (where YYY< XXX). If I was training by power alone I might try to aim for the XXX Watts level I did today. But as I will be not as fresh for me to keep at XXX Watts might mean my hr going into 180bpm or more and this will push me into over 90% max heart rate and I couldn't keep this for a 2x20.

Power tells me what I am producing but heart rate tells me how hard my body is working and some days it might need to work harder, due to temperature, tiredness etc, to maintain the same amount of power that I could do before.
User avatar
kieran
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:18 am
Location: Tír na nÓg

PreviousNext

Return to Training

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron