Chains.

A Place to idle the day away talking about anything you fancy. Expect to find cycling and non cycling topics inside

Chains.

Postby Antloony » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:31 pm

Ok Im after some advice from the great fountains of knowledge on here. My current chain on my Focus has done 2k miles, guess its time for a change, I have a chain wear indicator and its borderline showing being worn. Any tips on the best chains to use. Im using shimano 10 speed. I've heard the brand KMC banded around a bit on other forums. Anygood?

Thanks in advance for any help.
User avatar
Antloony
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1953
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:08 pm
Location: Sutton

Re: Chains.

Postby Antloony » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:34 pm

[quote="Sean Hogan - 何祥"]KMC Gold would be the only choice for a FASSSST boy like you Ant ;-)



It has the word GOLD in the title...that means it must be expensive.

and fast....dont you start. :D
User avatar
Antloony
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1953
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:08 pm
Location: Sutton

Re: Chains.

Postby Sylv » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:47 pm

Ant i got the SL (lighter) version of the KMC on ebay for £25 - i'll find you the link if you want

It's not gold but that's just cosmetic

Great chains
User avatar
Sylv
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 5742
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: londinium, lugdunum

Re: Chains.

Postby Antloony » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:49 pm

Brilliant, thanks guys, do they come with connectors etc?

Sorry if Im asking stupid newbie dumb questions.
User avatar
Antloony
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1953
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:08 pm
Location: Sutton

Re: Chains.

Postby Robh » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:54 pm

[quote="Antloony"]Brilliant, thanks guys, do they come with connectors etc?

Sorry if Im asking stupid newbie dumb questions.


Used Dura ACE and KMC SL happy with both...Prefer the KMC due to the connecting ink.

Rob
Robh
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 2:34 pm
Location: West Sussex, Crawley

Re: Chains.

Postby Andrew G » Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:41 pm

KMC chains are excellent Ant. I use the standard one rather than the lighter (slotted plates) one as I'd rather have a stronger chain than save a couple of grams, costs about £20 in GBs rather than the over priced slotted one. The "missing link" is great and easy to join.

I have a gold one on my commuter as it's the only one they had at the time but I think the silver ones look much nicer, so have that on t'other bike.
Andrew G
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 10477
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Selsdon

Re: Chains.

Postby Snoop Doug » Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:54 am

what's a chain wear indicator and how does it work :oops:
Snoop Doug
 

Re: Chains.

Postby mrP(Boonen)VT » Fri Sep 05, 2008 8:19 am

[quote="Snoop Doug"]what's a chain wear indicator and how does it work :oops:


It's a tool that measures chain wear :?

There are different types Cap'n, but basically they measure the distance between a number of rivets in the chain. My park toll one has a sliding scale indicating:
new,
part worn,
time for replacement,
hell you've knackered the whole drivetrain

They are all based on the principle that the distance between the pins increases with wear. You can do the same thing with a ruler - from the center of each roller to the center of the next is exactly 1/2" (12.7 mm) so if you take 20 links = 10" or 254mm.

From good old Sheldon.....

[quote]If you measure a one-foot length, placing an inch mark of the ruler exactly in the middle of one rivet, then looking at the corresponding rivet 12 complete links away. On a new, unworn chain, this rivet will also line up exactly with an inch mark. With a worn chain, the rivet will be past the inch mark.
This gives a direct measurement of the wear to the chain, and an indirect measurement of the wear to the sprockets:

If the rivet is less than 1/16" past the mark, all is well.
If the rivet is 1/16" past the mark, you should replace the chain, but the sprockets are probably undamaged.

If the rivet is 1/8" past the mark, you have left it too long, and the sprockets (at least the favorite ones) will be too badly worn. If you replace a chain at the 1/8" point, without replacing the sprockets, it may run OK and not skip, but the worn sprockets will cause the new chain to wear much faster than it should, until it catches up with the wear state of the sprockets.

If the rivet is past the 1/8" mark, a new chain will almost certainly skip on the worn sprockets, especially the smaller ones.


Guru P
User avatar
mrP(Boonen)VT
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 9:10 pm
Location: kitchen chair
Top

Re: Chains.

Postby Snoop Doug » Fri Sep 05, 2008 8:25 am

Cheers Guru P - I think mebbe I'll get me one then dig out your chain manual.....ommmmmm

Snoop
Snoop Doug
 

Re: Chains.

Postby George » Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:58 pm

Jut noticed that my TT bike's chain is shagged :?

I'm gonna replace it with a shimano 10 speed 105 as this is the cheapest and best :wink:
User avatar
George
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 10:20 am
Location: at a Conference in london

Re: Chains.

Postby Paul on the Pearson » Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:05 pm

Seeing as changing the chain is about the only mechanical thing I can do although it seems like major surgery I feel qualified to add my two pennies worth, although the last time I put a new chain on I had to go back to the shop, Bromley Bikes for help as I couldnt get the power links to join. Of course had I actually read that small piece of folded up paper you seem to get with things, that Ive now realised are the instructions I wouldnt of looked such an idiot. So my advice would be to get a KMC chain as their easy to fit. Sram 10 speed chains as I now realise are not as easy to fit. You have to sort of join the power links a bit and stamp on the pedals to fully click them together and you cant then un connect them.
Paul on the Pearson
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 497
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:29 pm
Location: Grove park

Re: Chains.

Postby Dominic » Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:19 pm

If anybody wants to check out Ribble's website they are selling KMC chains reduced from £15.95 to £6.95. The only problem for some of you may be that they are brown. I always buy a couple at a time and change them regulary to save cassette wear.

http://www.ribblecycles.co.uk/ProductLi ... &sortord=4

Oh and free postage until 09/09.

Plug over :D
Dominic
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 6:43 pm
Location: Merstham

Re: Chains.

Postby Sylv » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:47 pm

And you thought there was nothing more to say about chains?

[quote]When it comes to chain lubricants, there are as many theories as there are brands of chain oil. The truth of the chain oil mystery lies in how a chain operates when it is under load-and what it does elsewhere. Before we enter into this politically charged realm, let's explore a little.

One link is actually a pair of outer and inner side plates, riveted together by hardened-steel pins. The outer plates serve only as connectors and, because they are the widest part of the chain, are the first piece of the chain to hit the shifting aids (pins and ramps) on the cogs and chainrings. The inner plate assemblies ride on the sprockets and if you look closely, you'll see that they have a bushing pressed into each end that traps a roller which spins between plates and contacts the sprocket teeth.

Because the inner links have the internal moving parts and are the only place where the chain contacts the sprockets, this is the only place where there needs to be oil-and not much of it. You should not be able to see oil on the outside of a properly lubricated bicycle chain. Why? because the real enemy of a chain is dirt-which will cause more friction than oiling it can save you. Oil attracts fine particles of grit that work their way into the chain and, under tension, slow you down while they grind away at your expensive sprocket teeth and chain.

I apply a lightweight synthetic oil (choose a bike-branded one if you want-I use Mobil One), one drop at a time to the inner rollers. I work it in by spinning the cranks slowly for a minute (don't fling oil all over the bike), and then I wipe the sprockets, chain and rear derailleur pulleys clean and dry with a towel. When I am done, the chain doesn't look as if it was lubricated at all. When I return from a ride-my drivetrain and frame don't appear "lubricated" either.
Tip: The drier the dry lubes, and the waxier the wax-lubes are, the more often you will need to use them, as they don't go the distance.

Only one tooth close to the top-center of each sprocket is under load at any given time. The rest of the links around the sprocket are along for the ride. When the chain approaches the turning sprocket, the roller eases the link onto a sprocket tooth and the link rotates ever-so-slightly to match the diameter of the sprocket. Once the roller is seated against the sprocket, there is no further movement, the chain is stationary until it is released at the opposite side of the sprocket. Watch the chain articulate as it enters the sprockets and you'll realize how little movement there is between the link and its internal parts. Notice that, the larger the sprocket is, the less the chain has to bend as it engages the teeth.
Tip: Avoid using the 12-tooth cog if you can duplicate your gearing by using the big-ring and a larger sprocket in the middle of the cassette.

So, where is the friction? We already covered grime as a source of drag, but there are two more drag-producers in a derailleur drivetrain that should be tended to: side-loading of the chain, and the rear-derailleur pulleys.

Grab a short length of chain and wiggle the links. It will move freely. Now put a side load on it and do the same test and it will bind severely. When you cross-chain (big chainring/largest cog, or vice-versa), you force the outer-link and inner-link sideplates against each other and that creates a huge drag component.
Tip: Don't be afraid to cross-chain when you need to grab a gear in a hurry. You should use every gear combination on your bike-just switch back to a low-drag gear selection that keeps the chain and sprockets properly lined up when you are out of trouble.

The second source of drag are the two pulleys on your rear derailleur. There is no load at these points, but the jockey pulleys rotate significantly faster than any other part of the bicycle-and the tiny pulley sprockets force the chain links to quickly articulate over 90 degrees in opposite directions. Here is a place where ceramic bearings are a perfect application, because the radial loads are small, and rolling resistance is the major culprit. Here also is a case for using lightweight oil, because the chain links swing rapidly through a sharp arc, but under no load-so waxy or sticky lubricants will only cause drag.
Tip: Keep the jockey pulleys squeaky clean. Check the pulleys when the chain is removed. If they don't spin freely, replace them or eliminate the source of friction.
User avatar
Sylv
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 5742
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: londinium, lugdunum
Top

Re: Chains.

Postby Jon H » Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:03 pm

[quote="George"]Jut noticed that my TT bike's chain is shagged

Serves you right. If you didn't make it work so hard it'd last longer.
User avatar
Jon H
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 1:30 pm
Location: Bromley
Top

Re: Chains.

Postby Antloony » Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:00 pm

Once again thanks for the replies, I shall know take my new found knowledge and spend my money wisely and buy loads of beer and get w*nkered...no thats not right, I mean buy a new chain.
User avatar
Antloony
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1953
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:08 pm
Location: Sutton

Next

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests

cron