by Andrew G » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:24 am
True Jon, a touch of OCD going on there.
[quote="Dombo"]It would be interesting to know how they ride compare to more modern kit. There's something about the look of bikes of the 70's, 80s that you see in old TdF photos that modern ones somehow lack. Dunno what it is.
Class and style is what it's called
. Seriously I think a lot of it comes down to the individuality of the frames as they're hand made and a lot of the builder's skill comes out in some of the designs. Carbon frames always look a bit souless to me as they tend to look a bit generic, probably due to being moulded and/or glued moulded sections. There are some nice ones but they always seem to lack that certain something. Probably why I'd always go for titanium over carbon on a dream bike.
They're more flexy than modern bikes and I find that thin steel forks tends to be a bit more twitchy/nervous than a carbon fork. Not in a "oh-my-God" way but less stable if you ride no hands for example. I still think a good steel frame rides nicely and handles well though. Different frame builders built in different ways and different styles so they'd ride differently.
Steel is comfy and in most situations most people probably wouldn't be that aware of any frame flexing. To use the current marketing speak you get the vertical compliance, but not as much lateral stiffness
. A lot of audax riders like steel for the comfort it has. Carbon can be comfy but doesn't have the durability.