Do you like a nice retro bike...

A Place to idle the day away talking about anything you fancy. Expect to find cycling and non cycling topics inside

Do you like a nice retro bike...

Postby Andrew G » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:38 pm

...then there are some gorgeous machines [url=http://www.raydobbins.com/]here[/url].
Andrew G
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 10477
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Selsdon

Re: Do you like a nice retro bike...

Postby Mike I » Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:07 am

What makes you think that site isn't already in my Favourites?

No harm in spreading the word though. Keep up the good work!
User avatar
Mike I
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 9:35 am
Location: Tooting

Re: Do you like a nice retro bike...

Postby Dombo » Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:10 am

It would be interesting to know how they ride compare to more modern kit. There's something about the look of bikes of the 70's, 80s that you see in old TdF photos that modern ones somehow lack. Dunno what it is.
User avatar
Dombo
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 3:03 pm

Re: Do you like a nice retro bike...

Postby Jon H » Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:36 am

That bloke needs to get out more if he has that much time for polishing his bits and pieces.
User avatar
Jon H
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 1:30 pm
Location: Bromley

Re: Do you like a nice retro bike...

Postby Andrew G » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:24 am

True Jon, a touch of OCD going on there.

[quote="Dombo"]It would be interesting to know how they ride compare to more modern kit. There's something about the look of bikes of the 70's, 80s that you see in old TdF photos that modern ones somehow lack. Dunno what it is.

Class and style is what it's called :D . Seriously I think a lot of it comes down to the individuality of the frames as they're hand made and a lot of the builder's skill comes out in some of the designs. Carbon frames always look a bit souless to me as they tend to look a bit generic, probably due to being moulded and/or glued moulded sections. There are some nice ones but they always seem to lack that certain something. Probably why I'd always go for titanium over carbon on a dream bike.

They're more flexy than modern bikes and I find that thin steel forks tends to be a bit more twitchy/nervous than a carbon fork. Not in a "oh-my-God" way but less stable if you ride no hands for example. I still think a good steel frame rides nicely and handles well though. Different frame builders built in different ways and different styles so they'd ride differently.

Steel is comfy and in most situations most people probably wouldn't be that aware of any frame flexing. To use the current marketing speak you get the vertical compliance, but not as much lateral stiffness :roll: . A lot of audax riders like steel for the comfort it has. Carbon can be comfy but doesn't have the durability.
Andrew G
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 10477
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Selsdon

Re: Do you like a nice retro bike...

Postby mrP(Boonen)VT » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:07 pm

[quote]Carbon can be comfy but doesn't have the durability.


On what evidence Mr :mrgreen: ?
User avatar
mrP(Boonen)VT
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 9:10 pm
Location: kitchen chair

Re: Do you like a nice retro bike...

Postby Andrew G » Thu Sep 11, 2008 3:39 pm

Primarily I was referring to repairability of a steel frame in the event of an accident (tubes can be replaced etc.). Metal bends and is more likely to give you a warning, and doesn't shatter like carbon.

I have no evidence as such to point you to but have read various tales of failure in certain carbon frames/joints/bonds after x amount of time. Granted this may have been in part to the way they had been treated by the owner. I would never have carbon bars and stem as they take a lot of impact in an accident and I would never know if the structure had been compromised and wouldn't trust it. I'd also never buy a second hand carbon frame but be quite happy buying 2nd hand metal (steel/aluminium/titanium).

Even at the highest level, I read Lotto had a load of trouble one year (first year with Ridley's I think) with carbon stems snapping early season. They weren't 2nd hand crash damaged bits either.
Andrew G
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 10477
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Selsdon

Re: Do you like a nice retro bike...

Postby -Adam- » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:02 pm

Surely the cost if repairing a steel/aluminium/titanium frame by removing/replacing a tube far outweighs the initial cost of the frame?

But I agree on carbon bars and stems, I can't justify the expense given the doubts over them. Most pros stick to alu still. But a frames a frame, once it's broken, it's broken, no?
User avatar
-Adam-
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:38 pm
Location: Kingston/Epsom, well, everywhere really!

Re: Do you like a nice retro bike...

Postby Jon H » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:06 pm

If you keep replacing damaged tubes, a steel frame will go on forever... like Trigger's broom.
User avatar
Jon H
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 1:30 pm
Location: Bromley

Re: Do you like a nice retro bike...

Postby Andrew G » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:17 pm

[quote="Jon Hemming"]If you keep replacing damaged tubes, a steel frame will go on forever... like Trigger's broom.

:lol:
[quote="-Adam-"]Surely the cost if repairing a steel/aluminium/titanium frame by removing/replacing a tube far outweighs the initial cost of the frame?

In a lot of cases probably yes, but if you have a custom steel or titanium frame built to order then it would probably pay to replace a tube.
Andrew G
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 10477
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Selsdon
Top

Re: Do you like a nice retro bike...

Postby Mike I » Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:47 pm

.[quote]It would be interesting to know how they ride compare to more modern kit.


I ride both retro (1960) and modern steel frames. The older one is a bit lively at the front end. I think it might be down to the steeper head tube on the larger frame.

There are noticeable differences in the feel of the modern frames too though, and I think it's as much about geometry as it is about the type of tubing.
User avatar
Mike I
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 9:35 am
Location: Tooting
Top


Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests

cron