by Alex P » Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 pm
mmmmm......
[quote]One thing with the UCI coming out and backing him is that it sets a worrying trend that could be abused by any dishonest riders in the future who get doorstepped by an AFLD tester in France... if they were intent on cheating rather than just urgently needing to take a shower then 30 minutes could well be ample time to return enhanced values to within a normal range.
I'm sure that he has got a machine that sucks all his blood out superfast and then replaces it with one he made earlier, also time to carry out a full hair transplant (as hair readings show long term effects) like all the other 24 times he has been tested not positive (funny that)
Also single tester turns up (for the first time) with no official witnesses to support him, carries out test (once ID authenticated), completes form which states that there were no further comments or irregularities, both sign documents, copy kept by LA and then all tests prove negative. Weeks later.... aha.... he went for shower (or a dump but would he honestly say that) and he wasn't observed doing it......ergo he must be a cheat......BAN HIM!
Any court in the civilised world, apart from France of course, would throw this out in a second (or less) which is probably why the UCI are supporting the cyclist in this case....but it is France's party and they can cry if they want to.(sorry)
PS - Sean, the digest is looking great nowadays