addiscombe.org

by **Elliot M** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:15 am

what, predict them 30s after the fact?

by **Mike I** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:50 pm

But for the (entirely invented) 'legal reasons' preventing him from predicting the numbers ahead of the BBC's announcement of them, I am sure he would have done just that - probably in the privacy of his own home and on a lottery ticket :roll:

.

by **Snoop Doug** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:54 pm

He wasn't allowed to buy one, a lottery ticket that is. All adds to the confuffle he he

by **Elliot M** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:54 pm

It's clever how he stretches the time out while appearing to rush - eg writing the results down (which there is no logical reason to do) after all balls have been called. There is about 35 seconds to do the magic.

by **Elliot M** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:58 pm

One of the youtube comments suggests the balls are laser etched in situ - i find that quite believable

by **Ivor** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:15 pm

[quote="Elliot M"]One of the youtube comments suggests the balls are laser etched in situ - i find that quite believable

by **Dombo** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:43 am

easy, he broadcast on digital while watching the draw on terrestrial. 3-4 seconds delay allowed him time to get the numbers on the balls. I do it all the time at home during Mastermind, Question Time, Millionaire, etc calling out things in advance from the old telly in the kitchen while family watches the digimonster in the drawing room. They think I'm a genius. Kids get scared when I do it during a live news broadcast though

by **Elliot M** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:02 pm

[quote="Ivor"][quote="Elliot M"]One of the youtube comments suggests the balls are laser etched in situ - i find that quite believable

by **Elliot M** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:14 am

Dombo - didn't read your comment - didn't think of that!

by **Alex P** » Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:53 pm

A chap called Cyriak has the answer (potentially)

[youtubewww]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqAt2akPHJ8[/youtubewww]

by **MJ_1993** » Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:37 pm

yeah the sun being the reliable and intellectual paper it is had this a couple of days ago. why even teenagers buy the sun and actually still go on to read it is beyond me.

INDEPENDENT FTW

oh and i'm closet financial times reader too.

by **the other Steve Dennis** » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:10 am

I have inside info!

but it ruins the actual trick.

Split screen is close but incorrect

by **sonic909** » Thu Sep 17, 2009 10:42 am

[quote="the other Steve Dennis"]I have inside info!

but it ruins the actual trick.

Split screen is close but incorrect

addiscombe.org

How did he do that?

Re: How did he do that?

Re: How did he do that?

Re: How did he do that?

Re: How did he do that?

Re: How did he do that?

Re: How did he do that?

Re: How did he do that?

Re: How did he do that?

Re: How did he do that?

Re: How did he do that?

Re: How did he do that?

Re: How did he do that?

Re: How did he do that?

Who is online