Guilty verdict for driver

A Place to idle the day away talking about anything you fancy. Expect to find cycling and non cycling topics inside

Guilty verdict for driver

Postby Andrew G » Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:35 pm

Pleased to see a guilty verdict on this and hope a sensible sentence is given. Drove in to the back of him while he was racing and [quote]claimed she could not remember hitting Maj Rhys-Evans and only realised she had knocked him over when she heard a bang and saw her windscreen was smashed.


Another rider in the same race says the driver had "skimmed" her just before hitting Rhys-Evans.

[url]http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/cn_news_home/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=479743[/url]
Andrew G
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 10477
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Selsdon

Re: Guilty verdict for driver

Postby Antloony » Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:15 pm

Yep, pleased to see the guilty verdict too.

Has to be dangerous driving, careless driving is when you bump into someone else's car in Tescos car park, not wiping someone out and not even seeing them on a DC.
User avatar
Antloony
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1953
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:08 pm
Location: Sutton

Re: Guilty verdict for driver

Postby Amy » Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:48 am

I agree, what the hell was she doing, not to see somone until they get splattered across her windscreen??

Unfortunately, as I understand it, it's more difficult to prove the charge of dangerous driving as the charge of driving without due care and attention... :evil:

CTC is running a campaign against the SMIDSY excuse (as Sorry, Mate, I Didn't See You :evil: )

Well done to the jurors for going for the more severe charge

(though I'm rather confused - a jury of nine women and three women???)
User avatar
Amy
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 2956
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 12:59 pm
Location: Back where she started

Re: Guilty verdict for driver

Postby Marcus » Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:31 am

I too am glad the guilty verdict has been reached in this case. Although it is always very sad when any motorist is killed due to the lack of care by another road user. As has been said usually the charge is careless driving especially when it comes to the death of a cyclist.

Having only started cycling on the road since May of last year I encounter too many motorists who seem to think cyclists are insignificant and they continually get away with intimidating and scarring us using a lethal weapon.

Having lost a friend 18 months ago to a lorry that jumped a red light and drove over him and then only to be found guilty of careless driving and receiving 3 points, this case is a little more than pleasing that the correct verdict has been reached.
User avatar
Marcus
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 760
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:18 pm

Re: Guilty verdict for driver

Postby adrian » Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:26 pm

Under those circumstances she has to have been texting, fiddling around with a CD, looking for her fags or some such to have ploughed into this bloke like that.

She'd be able 'to live with herself' a lot easier - and make it easier on the bloke's family - if she came clean and owned up to exactly what she was doing. Hope she gets a long sentence.

[quote]a jury of nine women and three women
:roll:
User avatar
adrian
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 10:56 am
Location: Bromley

Re: Guilty verdict for driver

Postby Phil H » Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:03 pm

[quote="adrian"]Under those circumstances she has to have been texting, fiddling around with a CD, looking for her fags or some such to have ploughed into this bloke like that.


The thing is, you will see loads of drivers messing around with phones, SatNavs etc. and not paying attention, but because they were lucky enough not to hit anyone, nothing happens. Ideally, the police would be nicking people for not paying attention before they hit someone.
User avatar
Phil H
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1883
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:52 pm

Re: Guilty verdict for driver

Postby Dombo » Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:37 pm

[quote="Phil Hawkes"] Ideally, the police would be nicking people for not paying attention before they hit someone.


If real police were out and about on patrol they probably would.

Until they invent a speed camera that can pull you over for texting, eating, driving erratically, and invite you to step out of the car, then people will continue to text, talk on their mobiles, eat, and drive while drunk or drugged.
User avatar
Dombo
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 3:03 pm
Top

Re: Guilty verdict for driver

Postby Amy » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:45 am

She's been jailed for 21 months although 'there is no suggestion she was texting, changing the radio or doing anything at all'.

What the hell wasshe doing then at 70mph???

She's also beened banned from driving for 2 years - now is that after she gets out or while she's in prison?

I like the police comment ' that the case should "send a message to drivers across the country" to pay attention when they are behind the wheel.'
User avatar
Amy
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 2956
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 12:59 pm
Location: Back where she started

Re: Guilty verdict for driver

Postby Andrew G » Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:41 pm

[quote="Amy"]She's been jailed for 21 months although 'there is no suggestion she was texting, changing the radio or doing anything at all'.'

Certainly wasn't paying any attention to the road. I'm glad she's got a prison term, and quite why she felt that feeling remorse was a reason not to beggars belief. Well if you feel bad about it that's okay then :roll: .
Andrew G
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 10477
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Selsdon
Top


Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests

cron